- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:23:13 +0100
- To: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 12:23:11 UTC
In section 5.2 of the RDF-OWL document [1] we specify how RIF documents with two-ary import statements must be interpreted. however, we do not say anything about the case that an import statement refers to a location does not have an RDF graph. So, if Import(<u1> <p1>) ... Import(<un> <pn>) are the 2-ary import statements and one of u1,...,un does not point to an RDF graph, what should happen? Do we say that the document could be rejected, or do we leave this unspecified? related: what if pi denotes the OWL DL profile, but ui does not point to an OWL DL ontology? Should the document be rejected? I think so. Best, Jos [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Interpretation_of_Profiles -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar. - Donald Foster
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 12:23:11 UTC