- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:33:31 -0500
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
This was an informal meeting, to advance understanding of the issues, with no decisions, etc. So, these are more "notes" than "minutes". My sense of the outcomes: - Alan and Jos will talk more to get details on some real problems users will face if OWL follows the non-disjoint path - OWL will seriously consider dropping NCName, etc - RIF will seriously consider adopting owl:rational (and owl:real* ?) Actual notes: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/09-owl-rif-minutes.html -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 15:33:43 UTC