- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:05:11 +0100
- To: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <49888757.30907@inf.unibz.it>
I updated the safeness condition to fix the technical problem I noticed during the telephone conference and to improve the presentation. I hope it is now easier to follow. Please let me know if there are still problems in the presentation. The problem with the previous version of the definition was that it allowed to assign "bound" to all variables, even those appearing only in external terms. I now make a distinction between safe and strongly safe variables, where the strongly safe variables are those that are made safe by non-external atoms. It is required that all variables that are not strongly safe are assigned "unbound". Please *read carefully* and criticize. And I remind you that it is not necessary to wait until the next telephone conference before starting to read the definition. Best, Jos [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Core#Safeness -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar. - Donald Foster
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:08:56 UTC