> I hesitate to suggest this given how much work has gone into it but I > wonder if we should drop section 6.2 of SWC? I personally would not mind dropping the section, but it does make the document more "complete". > The OWL working group is developing an OWL-R fragment which is > implementable using rules and will presumably have normative status. It > is potentially confusing to have RIF generate an Informative OWL DLP > embedding which is similar but not identical. Well, this is OWL 1.0 DLP, whereas the OWL WG is working on OWL 2.0. But I see your point about the confusion. Best, Jos > > Thoughts? > > Dave -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- One man that has a mind and knows it can always beat ten men who haven't and don't. -- George Bernard ShawReceived on Monday, 26 May 2008 08:24:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:44 UTC