W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: SWC Appendix 6.2

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:23:56 +0100
Message-ID: <483A739C.90000@inf.unibz.it>
To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> I hesitate to suggest this given how much work has gone into it but I 
> wonder if we should drop section 6.2 of SWC?

I personally would not mind dropping the section, but it does make the 
document more "complete".

> The OWL working group is developing an OWL-R fragment which is 
> implementable using rules and will presumably have normative status. It 
> is potentially confusing to have RIF generate an Informative OWL DLP 
> embedding which is similar but not identical.

Well, this is OWL 1.0 DLP, whereas the OWL WG is working on OWL 2.0.
But I see your point about the confusion.

Best, Jos

> Thoughts?
> Dave


Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
   -- George Bernard Shaw

Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 08:24:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:44 UTC