Christian de Sainte Marie wrote: > PS: Another point I wanted to make is that, whatever the direction or > derivation, the XML syntax must be described more precisely in BLD. > BNF-like pseudo schema, as they relate easily to the EBNF, look like a > good option to me. Please refer to my recent mail on BLD -> XML, get the bundle, unbundle it someplace, then start navigating with the file wg-style-doc/000StartHere.html. As you can see by navigating through the BLD grammar HTML documentation (by clicking e.g. on Start and clicking on grammar symbols as they appear in grammar rules), you will notice that some rules are annotated (when the arrow is a link). Clicking on the arrow will then open a window giving you the precise correspondence between a PS construct and its XML structure. This documentation is automatically generated from the annotated grammar. -hak PS/ Harold: have looked at this yet? Pls let me know if that is useful or not for your purposes as I wish to wrap this up for now and move on to other pursuits. -- Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaciReceived on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:10:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:44 UTC