- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 12:53:37 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> In my previous e-mail I wrote a^^b as lit(a,b), which seems about > right. One more thing I forgot. As I said, I do not care too much and can go along with a syntax change. But lit(a,b) is unacceptable not only because it is too verbose, but also because it suggests that a literal is a term and both "a" and "b" are constants. But they are not. It is going to confuse the hell out of the readers and users, and should not be done. --michael
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 16:54:59 UTC