I first found it necessary to edit 2.5 Presentation Syntax to succinctly specify the EBNF for PRD PS. I took a bit of initiative and removed some of what I took to be arbitrary differences. E.g. I don't really like named argument UNITERMs, but I can see absolutely no reason why BLD should have them and PRD should not. I had to reconcile 6.1 and 2.5. I left Christian's extended Forall in 6.1 but not in 2.5. I then changed all the chicken examples (1.3, 2.3.1.2, 3.1) to use the PS defined in 2.5. I think there are some minor inconsistencies between 2.5, 6.1, and 2.* where the XML syntax is explained. I don't think I made it worse, though :-)Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2008 23:37:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:45 UTC