- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:28:21 +0300
- To: Gary Hallmark <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Gary Hallmark wrote: > > to compare if number N1 is less than N2 > > pred:numeric-less-than(N1 N2) > > to compare if string S1 is less than S2 > > pred:numeric-less-than(func:compare(S1 S2) 0) > > I would prefer > > pred:string-less-than(S1 S2) > > I propose we add > > pred:string-equal > pred:string-not-equal > pred:string-greater-than > pred:string-less-than > pred:string-greater-than-or-equal > pred:string-less-than-or-equal > > I also propose we either > a. remove func:compare I used the XPath/Xquery functions as a basis (where there are no such comparisons except "compare" for strings) to be discussed. Axel > or > > b. rename to func:string-compare, and add > func:numeric-compare > func:date-time-compare > ... and so on for all builtin types that are comparable > -- Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ Everything is possible: rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Resource. rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf. rdf:type rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf. rdfs:subClassOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty.
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2008 06:29:04 UTC