Re: draft of "RIF Core Design" text

Sandro,

Thanx for the draft.

Sandro Hawke wrote:
> 
> Body (in italic):
> 
>    This document is a placeholder. The design specified in the previous
>    draft of this document ([24]30 March 2007 draft) was intended to
>    serve as a core, common to all RIF dialects. The Working Group has
>    since decided not to use that design as a core.

I would not quite say that: my understanding is rather that, not to have 
"coreness" issues block the progress of that spec, we decided to stop 
worrying about them for now and continue with BLD. But we did not decide 
not to use the Core WD1 (or BLD for that matter) design for a possible 
future core.

What about: "This document...all RIF dialects. The Working Group has 
since decided to lower its priority on designing a common core and to 
progress on the design of a logic dialect first. That design has been 
renamed... OWL Compatibility. At the time of this publication, it has 
not yet been determined whether or not a new specification for RIF Core 
will be published in the future".

Christian

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:46:08 UTC