- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:09:22 -0400
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
> I would not quite say that: my understanding is rather that, not to have
> "coreness" issues block the progress of that spec, we decided to stop
> worrying about them for now and continue with BLD. But we did not decide
> not to use the Core WD1 (or BLD for that matter) design for a possible
> future core.
Good point. Now:
This document is a placeholder. The design specified in the previous
draft of this document ([24]30 March 2007 draft) was intended to
serve as a core, common to all RIF dialects. The Working Group has
since decided to lower its priority on designing a common core and
to first progress on the design of a logic dialect. With this in
mind, the previous core design has been renamed and improved and is
available as [25]RIF Basic Logic Dialect (BLD). There is also a
publication, [26]RIF RDF and OWL Compatibility. At the time of this
publication, it has not yet been determined whether or not a new
design for RIF Core will be published in the future.
[24] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-core-20070330
[25] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-bld/ [not live yet]
[26] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-rdf-owl/ [not live yet]
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 14:09:29 UTC