- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:27:00 -0500
- To: "Paul Vincent" <pvincent@tibco.com>
- Cc: "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> Christian: if the definition of a dialect is something that extends the
> core then RIF Core <> RIF dialect.
>
> If on the other hand RIF Core is just another name for RIF Horn, then it
> is a dialect.
After this debate, I wonder if we should set aside the notions of
"core", "dialects", and other packages of features for now and just
consider specific features for a while. Maybe Phase 1 really can be
just 10-20 standard features which implementors can mix and match,
without packaging. In any case, maybe it makes sense to consider
packaging separately from the features/components which are being
packaged into dialects (including core).
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 14:27:11 UTC