- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:14:11 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: edbark@nist.gov, W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote: > > Vendors specify the mapping; we specify the features they have to map to > -- or tell the user if they cannot -- right? This is what I understand the "default behavior requirement" is about. Btw, the "compliance model" requirement also mention optional features. We also discussed avoiding trviial compliance: is requiring that all compliant implementations list the feature they "opted out" enough for that purpose, or do we require that the specification of a dialect lists a limited number of optional features? Wouldn't that bring us back to the discussion of what is the bottom line? Christian
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 13:13:50 UTC