Re: types of conformance from Michael Kifer on 2006-12-19 (public-rif-wg@w3.org from December 2006)

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 06:39:40 -0500
To: edbark@nist.gov
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8870.1166528380@cs.sunysb.edu>

edbark@nist.gov wrote:
> 
> In the interest of delivering a useable specification in finite time, I 
> suggest that the RIFWG use its knowledge of mappings to condition the choices 
> for capabilities, syntax and semantics of the RIF subset languages, and stop 
> there.  The rest of the mapping technology issues will beget many academic 
> degrees and make certain toolsmiths richer than others, and that is as it 
> should be.

Ed,
Can you elaborate? What exactly are you proposing for RIFWG to do?


	--michael

Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 11:39:54 UTC