- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 14:38:26 -0400
- To: public-review-comments@w3.org
Council report: [[ We are overruling the objection because there seems to be broad support within the Working Group for addressing their substantive errata, and because it’s important for working groups to address substantive errata while maintaining their specifications. ]] https://www.w3.org/2025/04/rdf-star-council-report.html On 11/29/2024 5:36 PM, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote: > From: > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/rdf-star-wg-2024-a/results > > The scope of the extended charter should not be broadened by removing > the "editorial errata" constraint. > That section should be reverted to that of the initially proposed [1] > and current [2] charters > This should be taken as a formal objection to the scope changes, but > neither to the changes to extend the completion dates, nor to the change > in the team contact's fte. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2024/08/proposed-rdf-star-wg-charter.html > [2] https://www.w3.org/2022/08/rdf-star-wg-charter/ >
Received on Friday, 9 May 2025 18:38:25 UTC