- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:16:07 -0500
- To: public-review-comments@w3.org
From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-did-wg/2023Jul/0000.html (resent here since this is context information for an ongoing Council) -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Appeal of the WG Chairs on the draft DiD Working Group charter Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:23:17 -0400 From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org> To: Joe Andrieu <joe@legreq.com> CC: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>, public-did-wg@w3.org Context: Joe Andrieu requested to file an appeal on the DID WG chairs decision to merge some changes in the charter proposal to be submitted to AC review. Joe argues that this charter does not reflect the consensus of the WG. The chairs, on the other hand, argue that 1) while there is indeed no clear consensus, this charter is the most acceptable for the majority of the group (an assessment that was confirmed by a recent poll); and that 2) the charter is not a WG deliverable, and consensus must be reached at the AC level anyway, so Joe’s argument should be raised during AC review, not prior to it. Dear Joe, In response to your appeal (sent to Pierre-Antoine Champin and me on April 12, 2023), and in light of the discussions we had with you, with the DID Working Group chairs, and of the results of the poll sent to the DID Working Group on May 22, 2023 [1]. While the W3C team concurs there is no consensus within the Working Group, we reached the conclusion that the best way forward for the Working Group is to submit the charter proposal, in its current state [2], to the Advisory Committee for review, per section 4.3 Advisory Committee Review of a Charter [3]. We will clearly signal that there is dissent among the participants of the Working Group, and encourage all members (including those disagreeing participants) to discuss these issues as part of the AC review. We expect that the charter proposal may further evolve during this discussion, and hope that the end result will be acceptable to all members. Philippe Le Hegaret, W3C Strategy and Project Lead [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/117488/rechartering_survey/results [2] https://w3c.github.io/did-wg-charter/ [3] https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20230612/#CharterReview On 4/12/2023 6:20 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote: > Pierra-Antoine, > > As team contact, I am officially asking for an appeal to the decision by > the WG chairs. > > The required information is published publicly at > https://blog.joeandrieu.com/2023/04/12/fighting-for-consensus-at-the-w3c/ <https://blog.joeandrieu.com/2023/04/12/fighting-for-consensus-at-the-w3c/> > > I look forward to hearing from the Director.
Received on Monday, 5 February 2024 15:16:10 UTC