W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-review-announce@w3.org > October 2016

Re: WebRTC 1.0 Wide Review

From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:46:22 +0100
To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>
Cc: "public-review-announce@w3.org" <public-review-announce@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, "vivien@w3.org" <vivien@w3.org>, "member-i18n-core@w3.org" <member-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <867b5fe6-5c32-5580-83fb-a0ed9d24b1ad@w3.org>
Stefan, Dom,

Is it ok for me to set up an i18n issue label and tie it to a mechanism 
in your repo to notify i18n folks of changes?  (i have access to the 
repo, so i can do it myself; i just wanted to check you're ok with it)

cheers,
ri


On 05/10/2016 19:11, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK wrote:
> Hi Addison,
>
> let us come back regarding the goal date.
>
> The ED is at http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/
>
> Looking forward to your comments!
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
>
> On 05/10/16 19:14, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote:
>
>     The Internationalization (I18N) Working Group would like the opportunity to review this specification.
>
>     Do you have a goal date for going to CR? Do you have a link to your ED?
>
>     Regards (for I18N),
>
>     Addison
>
>     Addison Phillips
>     Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
>     Chair (W3C I18N WG)
>
>     Internationalization is not a feature.
>     It is an architecture.
>
>
>
>
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org]
>     > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:43 AM
>     > To: chairs@w3.org
>     > Cc: public-review-announce@w3.org; Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>;
>     > Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>; vivien@w3.org
>     > Subject: WebRTC 1.0 Wide Review
>     >
>     > Dear Chairs,
>     >
>     > Over the past few months, the WebRTC Working Group has sought reviews
>     > of a number of Working Groups and Interest Groups on its WebRTC 1.0 API,
>     > based on our understanding of the intersection of this specification with
>     > these groups' interests:
>     >
>     > * Web Apps / Web Platform:
>     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015OctDec/0071.html
>     >
>     > * Web Crypto:
>     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto-
>     > comments/2015Oct/0002.html
>     >
>     > * PF / APA:
>     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Oct/0093.html
>     >
>     > * PING:
>     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2016JanMar/0007.html
>     >
>     > * TAG:
>     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2016Feb/0000.html
>     >
>     > * WebAppSec:
>     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2016Feb/0000.html
>     >
>     > While we have not finished processing the feedback from all these groups
>     > yet and have still a number of issues to address on the specification, we
>     > would like to invite other groups who feel they would want to give review on
>     > the specification to let us know of their interest to review the document as
>     > soon as possible, as we are making our plans towards a Candidate
>     > Recommendation for that document.
>     >
>     > For the WebRTC Working Group Chairs,
>     > Dominique Hazael-Massieux, WebRTC WG Staff Contact
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:46:36 UTC