Re: WebRTC 1.0 Wide Review

Hi ri,

that's ok, please go ahead!

cheers,
stefan

On 05/10/16 20:46, "r12a" <ishida@w3.org> wrote:

    Stefan, Dom,
    
    Is it ok for me to set up an i18n issue label and tie it to a mechanism 
    in your repo to notify i18n folks of changes?  (i have access to the 
    repo, so i can do it myself; i just wanted to check you're ok with it)
    
    cheers,
    ri
    
    
    On 05/10/2016 19:11, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
    > Hi Addison,
    >
    > let us come back regarding the goal date.
    >
    > The ED is at http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/

    >
    > Looking forward to your comments!
    >
    > Best regards,
    > Stefan
    >
    > On 05/10/16 19:14, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote:
    >
    >     The Internationalization (I18N) Working Group would like the opportunity to review this specification.
    >
    >     Do you have a goal date for going to CR? Do you have a link to your ED?
    >
    >     Regards (for I18N),
    >
    >     Addison
    >
    >     Addison Phillips
    >     Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
    >     Chair (W3C I18N WG)
    >
    >     Internationalization is not a feature.
    >     It is an architecture.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >     > -----Original Message-----
    >     > From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org]
    >     > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:43 AM
    >     > To: chairs@w3.org
    >     > Cc: public-review-announce@w3.org; Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>;
    >     > Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>; vivien@w3.org
    >     > Subject: WebRTC 1.0 Wide Review
    >     >
    >     > Dear Chairs,
    >     >
    >     > Over the past few months, the WebRTC Working Group has sought reviews
    >     > of a number of Working Groups and Interest Groups on its WebRTC 1.0 API,
    >     > based on our understanding of the intersection of this specification with
    >     > these groups' interests:
    >     >
    >     > * Web Apps / Web Platform:
    >     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015OctDec/0071.html

    >     >
    >     > * Web Crypto:
    >     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto-

    >     > comments/2015Oct/0002.html
    >     >
    >     > * PF / APA:
    >     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Oct/0093.html

    >     >
    >     > * PING:
    >     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2016JanMar/0007.html

    >     >
    >     > * TAG:
    >     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2016Feb/0000.html

    >     >
    >     > * WebAppSec:
    >     > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2016Feb/0000.html

    >     >
    >     > While we have not finished processing the feedback from all these groups
    >     > yet and have still a number of issues to address on the specification, we
    >     > would like to invite other groups who feel they would want to give review on
    >     > the specification to let us know of their interest to review the document as
    >     > soon as possible, as we are making our plans towards a Candidate
    >     > Recommendation for that document.
    >     >
    >     > For the WebRTC Working Group Chairs,
    >     > Dominique Hazael-Massieux, WebRTC WG Staff Contact
    >
    >
    >

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 08:46:58 UTC