Re: WebRTC 1.0 Wide Review

Hi Addison,

let us come back regarding the goal date. 

The ED is at http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/


Looking forward to your comments!

Best regards,
Stefan

On 05/10/16 19:14, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote:

    The Internationalization (I18N) Working Group would like the opportunity to review this specification.
    
    Do you have a goal date for going to CR? Do you have a link to your ED?
    
    Regards (for I18N),
    
    Addison
    
    Addison Phillips
    Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
    Chair (W3C I18N WG)
    
    Internationalization is not a feature.
    It is an architecture.
    
    
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org]
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:43 AM
    > To: chairs@w3.org
    > Cc: public-review-announce@w3.org; Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>;
    > Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>; vivien@w3.org
    > Subject: WebRTC 1.0 Wide Review
    > 
    > Dear Chairs,
    > 
    > Over the past few months, the WebRTC Working Group has sought reviews
    > of a number of Working Groups and Interest Groups on its WebRTC 1.0 API,
    > based on our understanding of the intersection of this specification with
    > these groups' interests:
    > 
    > * Web Apps / Web Platform:
    > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015OctDec/0071.html

    > 
    > * Web Crypto:
    > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto-

    > comments/2015Oct/0002.html
    > 
    > * PF / APA:
    > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Oct/0093.html

    > 
    > * PING:
    > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2016JanMar/0007.html

    > 
    > * TAG:
    > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2016Feb/0000.html

    > 
    > * WebAppSec:
    > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2016Feb/0000.html

    > 
    > While we have not finished processing the feedback from all these groups
    > yet and have still a number of issues to address on the specification, we
    > would like to invite other groups who feel they would want to give review on
    > the specification to let us know of their interest to review the document as
    > soon as possible, as we are making our plans towards a Candidate
    > Recommendation for that document.
    > 
    > For the WebRTC Working Group Chairs,
    > Dominique Hazael-Massieux, WebRTC WG Staff Contact

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 18:12:30 UTC