- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:06:34 +0200
- To: cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On May 16, 2014, at 12:00 , cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be> wrote: > I think the need to phrase things that apologetically makes abundantly clear > how widespread the support for DRM isn't, at least on the end-user side Except that the users want to keep watching the content. And you’re mis-representing the argument. >> We are saying "we don't like DRM, but sadly we have to implement it" in >> public, and we are doing exactly that, in public. > > Mozilla doesn't "have to", Mozilla is "choosing to" > That's a crucial difference and not one you get to sweep under the rug Their assessment is that it is necessary if outcomes they do not want are to be avoided. That’s a requirement, “have to”. David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 10:07:05 UTC