- From: Bob Ham <rah@settrans.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:13:20 +0000
- To: <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
On 2014-05-16 10:06, David Singer wrote:
> On May 16, 2014, at 12:00 , cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be> wrote:
>> Mozilla doesn't "have to", Mozilla is "choosing to"
>> That's a crucial difference and not one you get to sweep under the
>> rug
>
> Their assessment is that it is necessary if outcomes they do not want
> are to be avoided. That’s a requirement, “have to”.
You use the word "want" and then use the word "requirement". What
you're saying here is: Mozilla is choosing to require the implementation
of EME. It's still a choice.
Twisting words won't give you the high ground. In fact, the lack of
high ground becomes more evident as you do so.
--
Bob Ham <rah@settrans.net>
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 10:13:42 UTC