- From: Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:02:11 -0400
- To: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
- CC: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 18/06/2013 12:38 PM, Emmanuel Revah wrote: > On 2013/06/18 02:53, Jeff Jaffe wrote: >> >> We could call it expensive content. > > > I don't think we should call it anything other than what it is: > content (or video content). The publishers desire to restrict the > visitor's possible actions regarding the content doesn't make it > "premium" or even expensive. > Agreed. "Expensive content" can be a very subjective term as it seems to afford a greater value to some content over other (whether copyrighted or not). This whole thing comes down to distribution. At the most, "distributed content" *might* do the job if we really want to make a distinction (and personally, I do not feel that necessity) but however this goes, I think we should steer clear of valuating content because it can mean different things to different stakeholders with different means, etc. Best regards, Catherine -- Catherine Roy http://www.catherine-roy.net
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 17:02:36 UTC