- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:12:16 +0200
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>, cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be>, "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
> it works for some people some of the time, for sure. it's a pretty uncertain and scary model, and far from being a slam dunk. I agree, but their are fair a view the user as an equal to themselves. Problem here is that corporations don't like it because is dificult to draw graphs and PowerPoints based on an economic model where everything is available to everybody by free. Point is, as I say before, being conscious that they will be free whatever happens and give some added value (some kind of "scarcity", like phisical copies or special editions or signed T-shirts or good audio systems on cinema theathers) that worth paying for them. > failure examples include the 'pay what you think it's worth' experiments, for example. > Well, I'll admit that I never believed this one in particular would work, but donations (a similar concept) does. -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 11:13:05 UTC