- From: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:57:20 -0700
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
> > As John and others have pointed out, the W3C rejecting EME will hardly > > stop interested companies from going ahead with it. In fact, several > > have already. The difference is that the W3C won't have to compromise > > its principles and mission. > > nor will high-value content be accessible through the web, referencable > through URLs, accessible using web accessibility techniques, stylable > using user style-sheets, or a lot of other things. > > do you really think there are no consequences? that other principles > won't suffer if you only look at this one? I'm well aware of those consequences. In fact, as I've said explicitly on this list in reply to a post by John: I understand that other principles will suffer, but I consider the Open Web principles to be of paramount importance. -- Duncan Bayne ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me at the above number.
Received on Sunday, 7 July 2013 05:57:44 UTC