- From: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:54:47 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
On Oct 25, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi all, > We are still lacking any evidence that show images have been adapted for the following three scenarios/use cases: > > * Print Where there isn’t currently any decent solution to a serving up screen/print appropriate images on a single page we can’t necessarily point to anything identical, but it’s not hard to see where a site like Flickr or SmugMug would be able to make use of this. I’m certain I’ve seen sites that offer reasonably-sized images alongside links to high-resolution images for the sake of printing. I’m hoping others chime in here; I’ll search, in the meantime. > * monochrome > * high-contrast Likewise, it’s tough to reliably detect when a user is in high-contrast mode as things stand now, so we might be hard-pressed to find an example of image swapping in the wild—which is not to say they don’t exist, but I don’t know of any. I’ve mostly been using this and “monochrome” as examples of the inherent flexibility of the media query approach. I think the important thing is to make sure that concept is well represented somehow. > > As per our document: > http://responsiveimagescg.github.com/ri-usecases/#print,-monochrome,-and-high-contrast > > Without having any actual proof that there are at least a few sites in the wild that have been designed with, for instance, the Kindle specifically in mind - it's difficult to justify use case 4.4. > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 18:55:28 UTC