- From: Chris McAndrew <chris@csmcreative.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:18:59 -0500
- To: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
- Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFV3ugnO0GNjT3Dm177ZQhRfe7Pyuwkq4t3SkAoTw42PYOeu=A@mail.gmail.com>
That is awesome guys. You guys have been doing the heavy hitting so congrats to you! On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com> wrote: > Hey guys! > > Just wanted to forward this along for the sake of anyone that isn’t > subscribed to the HTML WG mailing list. > > Now, this doesn’t represent a huge milestone in and of itself—it doesn’t > mean we’re any more or less likely to see the `picture` spec as a First > Public Working Draft. It *does* give us our next steps on the way to a > FPWD, and a rough timeline. > > The web standards process isn’t quick or easy, but we are making steady > progress. > > -M > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *Resent-From: *public-html-admin@w3.org > *From: *Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > *Subject: **RE: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG > * > *Date: *December 6, 2012 3:08:27 PM EST > *To: *Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> > *Cc: *Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "Edward O'Connor (ted@oconnor.cx)" < > ted@oconnor.cx>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org> > > Moving this non-technical discussion to public-html-admin@w3.org. I have > included the original message below. It can also be found at: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0173.html > > The HTML WG weekly teleconference discussed this item today. See minutes: > http://www.w3.org/2012/12/06-html-wg-minutes.html#item13 > > There seemed to be agreement on the call that the HTML WG should consider > your publication request along with an upcoming request to publish the > srcset extension specification [1] in January since the srcset author would > like some time to process some bugs filed on that specification. > > Note that since the functionality in the <picture> extension proposal [2] > overlaps with the functionality in the srcset attribute proposal it was > felt that it might be best if the two documents included something in their > Status sections to answer the question "Why is the WG publishing two > overlapping extension specs?". I suggest you work with the srcset > attribute author to see if you can agreement on that kind of text. > > The WG Chairs will bring this item forward in January or sooner if we see > progress on the srcset attribute proposal bugs. > > /paulc > HTML WG co-chair > > [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/Overview.html > [2] http://picture.responsiveimages.org/ > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 4:46 PM > To: public-html@w3.org > Cc: Ian Jacobs > Subject: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG > > Hi, > The RICG is seeking guidance on how to publish the Responsive Images Use > Cases document through the HTMLWG: > http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/ > > We would also like support to publish the picture element spec as a FPWD: > http://picture.responsiveimages.org/ > > Would appreciate some help to make that happen. > > Kind regards, > Marcos > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 22:20:17 UTC