- From: Fabian Steeg <steeg@hbz-nrw.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:12:19 +0200
- To: public-reconciliation@w3.org
Hi Go! On 9/7/22 12:38, Sugimoto, G. (Go) wrote: > Just wondering if there is a mistake in Example 1 in the spec > (https://reconciliation-api.github.io/specs/0.1/#example-1 > <https://reconciliation-api.github.io/specs/0.1/#example-1>). Correct > one would be (not VIAF): > > |{ "name": “|The Getty Vocabularies", Yes, that's right, thanks! For consistency with the following longer example (and the actual service at https://services.getty.edu/vocab/reconcile/), I think the name should be "Getty Vocabularies Reconciliation Service". Would you like to contribute that change yourself in a pull request? It can easily be created in the browser at https://github.com/reconciliation-api/specs/edit/master/latest/examples/manifest/valid/example-min.json. > In addition, my in-press paper may be of relevance for the API: > https://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/instance-level-analysis-linked-open-data-connectivity-cultural-heritage-entity-linking-and-0 Thanks for sharing that, looks interesting. I've added it to the collection of publications at https://etherpad.lobid.org/p/reconciliation-publications (though if I understand it correctly, it's not about our specific API or OpenRefine, so won't be linked via Wikidata as planned in that Etherpad – we should probably find a place to collect related publications like that for ourselves). Cheers, Fabian
Received on Monday, 12 September 2022 13:12:50 UTC