Re: TypeScript type definitions

I like it, good initiative. Using Typescript myself extensively as well.  A
technical comment: what about making the types a bit stricter. I.e.,
instead of
`termType: string`,
using
`termType: 'NamedNode' | 'BlankNode' | 'Literal' | 'Variable' |
'DefaultGraph'`

gr Laurens

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Ruben Taelman <ruben.taelman@ugent.be>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Some people (including myself) prefer using typed Javascript, using
> TypeScript for instance.
>
> As I was not able to find any type definitions for the RDFJS interfaces,
> I’ve implemented these myself here:
> https://github.com/rubensworks/DefinitelyTyped/commit/
> 44292d468be8893f589a1ee4a76dd8d50b588ce3
>
> Before I make a PR with these types to the DefinitelyTyped repo,
> so that these types would become available as `@types/rdf-js`,
> I first want to make sure everyone here agrees with this implementation.
>
> The JSDoc has been taken directly from the spec.
>
> Any feedback or comments are welcome!
>
> Kind regards,
> Ruben Taelman
>



-- 

VU University Amsterdam

Faculty of Exact Sciences

Department of Computer Science

De Boelelaan 1081 A

1081 HV Amsterdam

The Netherlands

www.laurensrietveld.nl
laurens.rietveld@vu.nl

Visiting address:

De Boelelaan 1081

Science Building Room T312