- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:39:08 +0200
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- CC: public-rdfjs@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 13 September 2015 11:39:29 UTC
On 09/13/2015 01:00 PM, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > Hi all, > >> What do you think to dicsuss some existing architecture choices of >> rdf-ext in https://github.com/rdf-ext/discussions/issues ? > > As a start, I'd suggest to discuss this outside of current RDF-Ext choices, > as to avoid criticizing and defending existing things. > It would also help us to think more out of the box. > > I'd therefore propose instead to have a discussion on: > what would an ideal RDF/JavaScript library look like? > > Then afterwards, we could see to what extent RDF-Ext fits this, > and which things (if any) we would like to change. > > https://github.com/rdf-ext/discussions/issues could be a good place, > but the drawback of an issue track is that it is chronological. > I'd therefore be in favor of a Wiki page, which we can organize thematically. how about: https://github.com/rdfjs/rdfjs.org/wiki/Architecture ? > > Just my two cents. > > Best, > > Ruben > > PS Sorry for all people I'm flooding with my replies yesterday and today; > it's not that I want to hijack the discussions here, I just have a habit of replying fast. i really appreciate your enthusiasm and recognize numerous past contributions to this ecosystem, i hope no one else here feels flooded ;)
Received on Sunday, 13 September 2015 11:39:29 UTC