- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:00:51 +0200
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: public-rdfjs@w3.org
Hi all, > What do you think to dicsuss some existing architecture choices of > rdf-ext in https://github.com/rdf-ext/discussions/issues ? As a start, I'd suggest to discuss this outside of current RDF-Ext choices, as to avoid criticizing and defending existing things. It would also help us to think more out of the box. I'd therefore propose instead to have a discussion on: what would an ideal RDF/JavaScript library look like? Then afterwards, we could see to what extent RDF-Ext fits this, and which things (if any) we would like to change. https://github.com/rdf-ext/discussions/issues could be a good place, but the drawback of an issue track is that it is chronological. I'd therefore be in favor of a Wiki page, which we can organize thematically. Just my two cents. Best, Ruben PS Sorry for all people I'm flooding with my replies yesterday and today; it's not that I want to hijack the discussions here, I just have a habit of replying fast.
Received on Sunday, 13 September 2015 11:01:22 UTC