On Apr 18, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote: > > Hi Jarno: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >> "Also, in both cases, you use #me..." >> #me is in there because I copied it from Niklas's example. To be honest I haven't got a clue yet as to when use # and when not, simply because I haven't looked into it yet. I already was dancing around the table to finally get this far. Because I'm finally starting to make sense of the similarities between Microdata and RDFa not only my Microdata markup is improving but have I also become interested again in trying to understand RDFa (finally). So for now I'm enjoying the moment, even though I know I'm not there yet. Much to learn still. > > You (and others) might find my RDFa / schema.org tutorial at http://stuff.coffeecode.net/2014/schema_org_codelab/ useful, as it gradually walks through various scenarios introducing the addition of schema.org via RDFa to a simple document, with a rationale at each step for why you would want to use a particular construct. That's a great tutorial, Dan! We should link to it from rdfa.info. Gregg > It is by no means exhaustive, but I think it offers a useful intermediate step between the RDFa Lite spec-as-tutorial at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-lite/ (which is wonderful but brief) and the RDFa 1.1 primer at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-lite/ (which is also wonderful and more in-depth). And as the codelab is oriented towards hands-on learning and checking your efforts with various tools, it might appeal to a different type of learner. > > (Feedback welcome, naturally!) > > Dan >
Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 17:09:24 UTC