- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:07:00 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org, foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, lorrie@cs.cmu.edu, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Hi Dan, I thought POWDER [1] was the more up-to-date way of doing what you want, but I'm not completely sure on that. And I have seen examples of POWDER using RDFa...but I'm not sure where. I don't know if these two "not sures" are any good to you...but there you have it. :) Regards, Mark [1] <http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > Background: Last night I added http://userfly.com/ tracking .js to the > FOAF site (it already has google analytics in there). This morning, I > woke up thinking about a P3P-in-RDFa design. I think it was guilt - the > site really should have a clear privacy policy, either in prose or > prose+P3P. > > So I started an exploration of how P3P might look in XHTML+RDFa. > > http://identi.ca/group/rdfa > http://identi.ca/notice/2030239 > > I extracted the XML sample from the P3P-in-RDF W3C Note (which is 7+ > years old, oh my) ... > > http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/2009/rdfa/p3p/example1.xml > > > And have began trying to turn it into quite literal RDFa: > > http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/2009/rdfa/p3p/example1.html > > This is wf XHTML but somehow the little bit of RDFa I've tried writing > (from memory) there isn't parsing with raptor/librdfa. I don't have time > to experiment today so thought I'd throw this out for consideration in > its current form. Help very much welcomed. > > I like the idea of having some easy XHTML templates that also count as > P3P. Does it sound plausible to anyone else? I'd like them digitally > signable too, but that's another story... > > For the eventual markup, the p3p-in-rdf stuff is rather verbose in rdfa, > I'd suggest at least having shorter property names. But perhaps privacy > things have moved on in other ways since 2002? > > cheers, > > Dan > > > ps. Lorrie, the example still uses AT&T ... should this be > example.com-ified? > -- > http://danbri.org/ > _______________________________________________ > foaf-dev mailing list > foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev > -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 12:07:38 UTC