- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:57:35 +0100
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>, public-rdfa@w3.org, "foaf-dev Friend of a" <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, lorrie@cs.cmu.edu, "Renato Iannella" <renato@nicta.com.au>
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:56:52 +0100, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
> This is wf XHTML but somehow the little bit of RDFa I've tried writing
> (from memory) there isn't parsing with raptor/librdfa. I don't have time
> to experiment today so thought I'd throw this out for consideration in
> its current form. Help very much welcomed.
Looks like you got your xmlns: prefixes wrong (late night hacking? :-) ):
<p xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
> I like the idea of having some easy XHTML templates that also count as
> P3P. Does it sound plausible to anyone else?
Absolutely brilliant idea.
> For the eventual markup, the p3p-in-rdf stuff is rather verbose in rdfa,
> I'd suggest at least having shorter property names.
Well, at the cost of more prefixes, you could mitigate it slightly with:
xmlns:p3pphone="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/p3prdfv1#business.contact-info.telecom.telephone."
Telephone: <span property="p3pphone:intcode">1</span>
<span property="p3pphone:loccode">888</span>
<span property="p3pphone:number">928-8932</span>.
Best wishes,
Steven
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 10:57:48 UTC