- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:56:52 +0100
- To: public-rdfa@w3.org, foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, lorrie@cs.cmu.edu, Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Background: Last night I added http://userfly.com/ tracking .js to the FOAF site (it already has google analytics in there). This morning, I woke up thinking about a P3P-in-RDFa design. I think it was guilt - the site really should have a clear privacy policy, either in prose or prose+P3P. So I started an exploration of how P3P might look in XHTML+RDFa. http://identi.ca/group/rdfa http://identi.ca/notice/2030239 I extracted the XML sample from the P3P-in-RDF W3C Note (which is 7+ years old, oh my) ... http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/2009/rdfa/p3p/example1.xml And have began trying to turn it into quite literal RDFa: http://svn.foaf-project.org/foaftown/2009/rdfa/p3p/example1.html This is wf XHTML but somehow the little bit of RDFa I've tried writing (from memory) there isn't parsing with raptor/librdfa. I don't have time to experiment today so thought I'd throw this out for consideration in its current form. Help very much welcomed. I like the idea of having some easy XHTML templates that also count as P3P. Does it sound plausible to anyone else? I'd like them digitally signable too, but that's another story... For the eventual markup, the p3p-in-rdf stuff is rather verbose in rdfa, I'd suggest at least having shorter property names. But perhaps privacy things have moved on in other ways since 2002? cheers, Dan ps. Lorrie, the example still uses AT&T ... should this be example.com-ified? -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 09:57:33 UTC