- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:10:40 +0000
- To: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org
On 10 Dec 2008, at 10:13, Toby A Inkster wrote:
>> 2. Behaviour of datatype="" when the content includes *RDFa* markup.
>> Let's say I have this in my HTML:
>>
>> <p about="#me" property="bio:olb">
>> I work at
>> <a rel="foaf:workplaceHomepage" href="http://www.deri.ie/">DERI
>> Galway</a>.
>> </p>
>>
>> This works as expected, it creates two triples, a bio:olb triple
>> whose
>> value is an rdf:XMLLiteral, and a foaf:workplaceHomepage triple whose
>> value is the DERI URL.
>
> Someone butt in and correct me if I'm wrong, which I may very well
> be, but actually the *opposite* behaviour should be expected. With
> your initial HTML sample, only one triple should be created - the
> XMLLiteral. The foaf:workplaceHomepage should be *ignored*!
You are right, and this is actually what happened. I didn't check
carefully what actually happens in the “good” case. Sorry for causing
confusion.
> Take a look at the RDFa syntax specification and search it for the
> string "[recurse]" - you'll find it crops up four times in the
> processing sequence. The key bits are:
>
> "1. First, the local values are initialized, as follows: the
> [recurse] flag is set to 'true' {...}"
>
> "9. {...} Once the triple has been created, if the [datatype] of the
> [current object literal] is rdf:XMLLiteral, then the [recurse] flag
> is set to false."
>
> "11. If the [recurse] flag is 'true', all elements that are children
> of the [current element] are processed using the rules described
> here {...}"
This still seems to indicated that in the case of @datatype="",
processing should continue into the subtree.
So I still believe that the Distiller is wrong in the @datatype=""
case. It does not generate triples for RDFa embedded inside the
literal, but it should.
Richard
>
>
> So RDFa Distiller does seem to have a bug, but a different bug from
> the one you thought it did.
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 17:11:20 UTC