Re: any23 RDFa test suite results

Sorry, you're going to need to give more context here. What URL is responding with application/x-msdos-program? Does this relate to any23, or http://rdfa.info?

Note that we removed the any23 reports for the HTML+RDFa 1.1 implementation report due to lack of response and low conformance. The current report is at http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 24 March 2012 21:50, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote:
> I did a recent update and added any23 [1] to the processor list of the RDFa Test Suite. As any23 is widely used, and was, in fact, used for the recent Web Data Commons structured data extraction [1]. This result is of great benefit to the structured data community. As they report, they used any23 for extracting data from the pages. Therefore, I thought it would be useful to see how any23 actually performs in extracting RDFa.
> 
> I ran the RDFa Test Suite using both RDFa XHTML+RDFa 1.0 [3] and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [4] .
> 
> For XHTML+RDFa 1.0, any23 passes 97 out of 117 (82%) of the tests .
> For XHTML+RDFa 1.1, any23 passes 89 out of 163 (55%) of the tests.
> 
> An easier way for the any23 group to go, that would likely also result in improved performance, would be to use Niklas' Clojure implementation [5], which also runs in the Java VM.
> 
> Hi all is there any reason that /JSON/ gives the following mime type?
> 
> Content-Type: application/x-msdos-program
> 
>  
> 
> Gregg
> 
> [1] http://any23.org/
> [2] http://webdatacommons.org/
> [3] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.0-xhtml1.html
> [4] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.1-xhtml1.html
> [5] https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa
> 

Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 22:12:00 UTC