W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: any23 RDFa test suite results

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:19:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLdUo45hLqhR57OMrvPUDGCMH1DeWLqxaK0vRcf83gxpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
Cc: public-rdfa-wg WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 11 October 2013 00:11, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> wrote:

> Sorry, you're going to need to give more context here. What URL is
> responding with application/x-msdos-program? Does this relate to any23, or
> http://rdfa.info?
>
> Note that we removed the any23 reports for the HTML+RDFa 1.1
> implementation report due to lack of response and low conformance. The
> current report is at http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/.
>

Apologies, just try something like:

http://any23.org/json/http://melvincarvalho.com

We can move this to github issues if that works better ...


>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 24 March 2012 21:50, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote:
>
>> I did a recent update and added any23 [1] to the processor list of the
>> RDFa Test Suite. As any23 is widely used, and was, in fact, used for the
>> recent Web Data Commons structured data extraction [1]. This result is of
>> great benefit to the structured data community. As they report, they used
>> any23 for extracting data from the pages. Therefore, I thought it would be
>> useful to see how any23 actually performs in extracting RDFa.
>>
>> I ran the RDFa Test Suite using both RDFa XHTML+RDFa 1.0 [3] and
>> XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [4] .
>>
>> For XHTML+RDFa 1.0, any23 passes 97 out of 117 (82%) of the tests .
>> For XHTML+RDFa 1.1, any23 passes 89 out of 163 (55%) of the tests.
>>
>> An easier way for the any23 group to go, that would likely also result in
>> improved performance, would be to use Niklas' Clojure implementation [5],
>> which also runs in the Java VM.
>>
>
> Hi all is there any reason that /JSON/ gives the following mime type?
>
> Content-Type: application/x-msdos-program
>
>
>
>>
>> Gregg
>>
>> [1] http://any23.org/
>> [2] http://webdatacommons.org/
>> [3] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.0-xhtml1.html
>> [4] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.1-xhtml1.html
>> [5] https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa
>>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 22:19:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:35 UTC