W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: any23 RDFa test suite results

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:22:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLM3OACe+Hx07rZKhXJ3EHqFtdah961Uoc1HfXxP1NZ_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Cc: public-rdfa-wg WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 24 March 2012 21:50, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote:

> I did a recent update and added any23 [1] to the processor list of the
> RDFa Test Suite. As any23 is widely used, and was, in fact, used for the
> recent Web Data Commons structured data extraction [1]. This result is of
> great benefit to the structured data community. As they report, they used
> any23 for extracting data from the pages. Therefore, I thought it would be
> useful to see how any23 actually performs in extracting RDFa.
>
> I ran the RDFa Test Suite using both RDFa XHTML+RDFa 1.0 [3] and
> XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [4] .
>
> For XHTML+RDFa 1.0, any23 passes 97 out of 117 (82%) of the tests .
> For XHTML+RDFa 1.1, any23 passes 89 out of 163 (55%) of the tests.
>
> An easier way for the any23 group to go, that would likely also result in
> improved performance, would be to use Niklas' Clojure implementation [5],
> which also runs in the Java VM.
>

Hi all is there any reason that /JSON/ gives the following mime type?

Content-Type: application/x-msdos-program



>
> Gregg
>
> [1] http://any23.org/
> [2] http://webdatacommons.org/
> [3] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.0-xhtml1.html
> [4] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.1-xhtml1.html
> [5] https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 13:23:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:35 UTC