- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:22:27 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 13:23:02 UTC
On 24 March 2012 21:50, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: > I did a recent update and added any23 [1] to the processor list of the > RDFa Test Suite. As any23 is widely used, and was, in fact, used for the > recent Web Data Commons structured data extraction [1]. This result is of > great benefit to the structured data community. As they report, they used > any23 for extracting data from the pages. Therefore, I thought it would be > useful to see how any23 actually performs in extracting RDFa. > > I ran the RDFa Test Suite using both RDFa XHTML+RDFa 1.0 [3] and > XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [4] . > > For XHTML+RDFa 1.0, any23 passes 97 out of 117 (82%) of the tests . > For XHTML+RDFa 1.1, any23 passes 89 out of 163 (55%) of the tests. > > An easier way for the any23 group to go, that would likely also result in > improved performance, would be to use Niklas' Clojure implementation [5], > which also runs in the Java VM. > Hi all is there any reason that /JSON/ gives the following mime type? Content-Type: application/x-msdos-program > > Gregg > > [1] http://any23.org/ > [2] http://webdatacommons.org/ > [3] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.0-xhtml1.html > [4] http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/any23-rdfa1.1-xhtml1.html > [5] https://github.com/niklasl/clj-rdfa >
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 13:23:02 UTC