- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 12:59:16 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 10:59:49 UTC
Manu, tiny things - in the change section you should also say that the property copying, that was a feature at risk in the LC, is now integral part of the document - to avoid misunderstanding at a cursory read, let us use [RDF11-CONCEPTS] for the reference to RDF 1.1 Talk to you soon Ivan Manu Sporny wrote: > I have addressed all known editorial comments for the HTML+RDFa 1.1 > specification and prepared a Proposed Recommendation draft here: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/ > > There is only one item related to the draft that we need to discuss > (additional RDFa Processing Rule #8). > > We have passed the plan on dealing with the two non-normative features > by W3C Management and there seems to be agreement on the approach. There > are no known issues at this point that would prevent the document from > going to REC, so if you know of any, now would be the time to speak up. :) > > The plan is to request transition to PR during the call tomorrow. > > -- manu > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 10:59:49 UTC