Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft ready

IN the list of people who provided feedback I see "Thomas Adamich" and
"Tom Adamich". Is that correct? If not, are there other repeats I've
missed?

 -Sebastian

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> I have addressed all known editorial comments for the HTML+RDFa 1.1
> specification and prepared a Proposed Recommendation draft here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/
>
> There is only one item related to the draft that we need to discuss
> (additional RDFa Processing Rule #8).
>
> We have passed the plan on dealing with the two non-normative features
> by W3C Management and there seems to be agreement on the approach. There
> are no known issues at this point that would prevent the document from
> going to REC, so if you know of any, now would be the time to speak up. :)
>
> The plan is to request transition to PR during the call tomorrow.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch
> http://blog.meritora.com/launch/
>

Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 02:07:25 UTC