- From: エリクソン トーレ <t-eriksson@so.taisho.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 04:24:59 +0000
- To: "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
> ISSUE-149 (HTML Literals): Merge HTML Literals into RDFa Core [RDFa 1.2+] > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/149 > > Raised by: Manu Sporny > On product: RDFa 1.2+ > > Alex Milowski suggested that we should move HTML Literals into RDFa Core. > We currently support XML Literals in RDFa Core, so the argument that we > shouldn't mention HTML Literals because RDFa Core is supposed to be > language-agnostic seems like a weak argument. Wouldn't the right argument be that XMLLiteral is the only datatype built into RDF itself? Tore Eriksson
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 04:26:08 UTC