Re: ISSUE-150 (Property Copying in Core): Move the Property Copying feature from HTML+RDFa to RDFa Core [RDFa 1.2+] from Sebastian Heath on 2013-05-28 (public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from May 2013)

From: Sebastian Heath <sebastian.heath@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 23:44:40 -0400
To: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACsb_1qk3oDm5i727830yvUnx44hYnkaHj_RYZeJLb7aR3dAnw@mail.gmail.com>

What is the process for nominating an issue to be reconsidered for
rdfa 1.2? I would like to see that happen for the discussion that came
out of ISSUE 147 [1].

 Thanks,

 -Sebastian


[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/147

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:43 PM, RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ISSUE-150 (Property Copying in Core): Move the Property Copying feature from HTML+RDFa to RDFa Core [RDFa 1.2+]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/150
>
> Raised by: Manu Sporny
> On product: RDFa 1.2+
>
> Alex Milowski suggested that we should move the Property Copying feature from HTML+RDFa to RDFa Core. The feature is currently in HTML+RDFa because it was too late to put it into RDFa Core at the time we found consensus on the feature. Many implementations implement Property Copying, it was always designed to go into RDFa Core. The next RDFa WG should move this feature into RDFa Core.
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 03:45:11 UTC