Re: new draft for the RDFa Primer

It is definitely worth upgrading - the bibliography is not maintained that
well in the older ReSpec any longer.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote:

> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:51 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I have made some editing on the Primer, and a new draft is at
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-primer/Overview-src.html
> >
> > most of the changes were the various error reports coming in since the
> last publication. I have also added a new section (2.1.3) on the property
> copying stuff (and also a note in section 2.1.4 that tackles a similar
> problem but using @resource). Comments please...
>
> There's a problem in the second example in 2.1.3: the link href's are to
> "#ccpattern", but the Pattern is defined with @resource="ccpattern"; you're
> probably confusing with the @id attribute. It should be changed to
> @resource="#ccpattern".
>
> Otherwise, the section looks great, and flows well form the proceeding.
>
> The RDF-SPARQL-QUERY reference should probably be updated to SPARQL-QUERY
> for SPARQL 1.1.
>
> Interesting that there's no link to RDF-CONCEPTS; is this intentional? I
> suppose RDF-PRIMER does it.
>
> > Also: Gregg or Manu: is it worth the trouble changing respec to the
> newest version? What does it entail for the document?
>
> It's pretty straight-foward; it took me 10 minutes or so to update
> rdfa-in-html, but that was because some custom features needed to be ported
> over, which I've already done. I'd be happy to help you with it, if it's a
> problem. I think being on the latest version is a good idea.
>
> Gregg
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 03:23:05 UTC