Re: Resolving remaining issues in the issue tracker

On Jan 7, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 7, 2013, at 18:43 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 1:48 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 03:40 , Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> ISSUE-145: @content override @value
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/145
>>>> 
>>>> PROPOSAL: When both @content and @value appear on the same HTML element,
>>>> the value of @content MUST be used.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> +1.
>> 
>> Note that @value seems to be of extremely dubious value
> 
> Dubious value (sic!) because the HTML5 definition are unclear or for RDFa? If the former then I think this WG should not take side on that, and leave it as is...

My read of the HTML5 doc shows only a couple of uses of @value:

The li element used within an ol, where @value is an integer (ordinal value)

Various form controls, where it is used as the value of the control

None of these seem to be valid meta-data use cases to me, so I don't see why this attribute should be called out in HTML+RDFa at all.

Gregg

> Ivan
> 
> 
>> , and I suggest that we just drop it entirely. I marked it as being at risk.
>> 
>> If we did keep it, I agree that @content must be used first; same for @datetime.
>> 
>> Gregg
>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 18:11:15 UTC