Re: Resolving remaining issues in the issue tracker

On Jan 7, 2013, at 18:43 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

> On Jan 7, 2013, at 1:48 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 03:40 , Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> ISSUE-145: @content override @value
>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/145
>>> 
>>> PROPOSAL: When both @content and @value appear on the same HTML element,
>>> the value of @content MUST be used.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> +1.
> 
> Note that @value seems to be of extremely dubious value

Dubious value (sic!) because the HTML5 definition are unclear or for RDFa? If the former then I think this WG should not take side on that, and leave it as is...

Ivan


> , and I suggest that we just drop it entirely. I marked it as being at risk.
> 
> If we did keep it, I agree that @content must be used first; same for @datetime.
> 
> Gregg
> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf