Re: Suggestions for Errata RDFa Core 1.1

On 7 Apr 2013, at 03:21, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote:

> Thanks for this detailed list.  I will take some time to look it over in the coming days.  Manu and Ivan, I assume editorial changes like this are in scope?
> 

Yes.

Ivan


> 
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de> wrote:
>> Hello RDFa Working Group,
>> 
>> while translating the RDFa Core 1.1 spec, I found some things, that
>> might need a look at. Mostly just small things.
>> 
>> I attached an HTML file with all the suggestions I have. Ivan
>> mentioned that there might be a PER coming for some RDFa specs, so
>> this might help a bit.
>> 
>> I am not sure, if the attachment is delivered properly, if not,
>> please advise me, how to send the HTML file again.
>> 
>> There are two questions inside, that would help my translation, so if
>> I don't hear anything, I might bother you in a few days.
>> 
>> So long
>> Stefan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Stefan Schumacher
>> Lonavala, Maharashtra, India
>> +91 9923670737
>> 
>> 
>> The following section of this message contains a file attachment
>> prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
>> If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,
>> you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
>> If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.
>> 
>>    ---- File information -----------
>>      File:  Suggested_Errata_RDFa_Core_1_1.html
>>      Date:  6 Apr 2013, 19:53
>>      Size:  25921 bytes.
>>      Type:  Unknown
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.