Re: Suggestions for Errata RDFa Core 1.1

Thanks for this detailed list.  I will take some time to look it over in
the coming days.  Manu and Ivan, I assume editorial changes like this are
in scope?


On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>wrote:

> Hello RDFa Working Group,
>
> while translating the RDFa Core 1.1 spec, I found some things, that
> might need a look at. Mostly just small things.
>
> I attached an HTML file with all the suggestions I have. Ivan
> mentioned that there might be a PER coming for some RDFa specs, so
> this might help a bit.
>
> I am not sure, if the attachment is delivered properly, if not,
> please advise me, how to send the HTML file again.
>
> There are two questions inside, that would help my translation, so if
> I don't hear anything, I might bother you in a few days.
>
> So long
> Stefan
>
>
>
> --
> Stefan Schumacher
> Lonavala, Maharashtra, India
> +91 9923670737
>
>
> The following section of this message contains a file attachment
> prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
> If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,
> you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
> If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.
>
>    ---- File information -----------
>      File:  Suggested_Errata_RDFa_Core_1_1.html
>      Date:  6 Apr 2013, 19:53
>      Size:  25921 bytes.
>      Type:  Unknown
>
>


-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.