- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:12:26 -0400
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Sep 30, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it feasible for us to incorporate the rdf:HTML datatype into > HTML5+RDFa? That is, how do the timelines of RDF 1.1 and HTML5+RDFa > recommendations line up? Specification-wise, it seems [1] should do > the job.. +1 We really should do this, I added support to my processor some time ago. It's really a better fit than XMLLiteral for an HTML-based host language. Gregg > Best regards, > Niklas > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> Exactly. No big deal, in fact. >> >> But... until this is a standard, it cannot be, normatively, added to the RDFa document. But an informal note is possible. >> >> Ivan >> >> --- >> Ivan Herman >> Tel:+31 641044153 >> http://www.ivan-herman.net >> >> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) >> >> >> >> On 16 May 2012, at 18:42, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >> >>> Seems like the effect on processing rules would be parallel to XMLLiteral, but without the @xmlns or @lang/@xml:lang promotion. >>> >>> Gregg >>> >>> On May 16, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>>> See, eg, >>>> >>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012May/0027.html >>>> >>>> although the mail went to another group, it is good to know for this group, too, per HTML5+RDFa at some point in the future... >>>> >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2012 21:13:03 UTC