W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: FYI: HTML datatype in RDF 1.1

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:52:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CADjV5jfHcARz1=waEL+OVTpZvgVdLEROu1nkAz-=_Dt743Q09g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Is it feasible for us to incorporate the rdf:HTML datatype into
HTML5+RDFa? That is, how do the timelines of RDF 1.1 and HTML5+RDFa
recommendations line up? Specification-wise, it seems [1] should do
the job..

Best regards,
Niklas

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html


On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Exactly. No big deal, in fact.
>
> But... until this is a standard, it cannot be, normatively, added to the RDFa document. But an informal note is possible.
>
> Ivan
>
> ---
> Ivan Herman
> Tel:+31 641044153
> http://www.ivan-herman.net
>
> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
>
>
>
> On 16 May 2012, at 18:42, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
>> Seems like the effect on processing rules would be parallel to XMLLiteral, but without the @xmlns or @lang/@xml:lang promotion.
>>
>> Gregg
>>
>> On May 16, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>
>>> See, eg,
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012May/0027.html
>>>
>>> although the mail went to another group, it is good to know for this group, too, per HTML5+RDFa at some point in the future...
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2012 19:53:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:32 UTC