- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:52:14 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Is it feasible for us to incorporate the rdf:HTML datatype into HTML5+RDFa? That is, how do the timelines of RDF 1.1 and HTML5+RDFa recommendations line up? Specification-wise, it seems [1] should do the job.. Best regards, Niklas [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Exactly. No big deal, in fact. > > But... until this is a standard, it cannot be, normatively, added to the RDFa document. But an informal note is possible. > > Ivan > > --- > Ivan Herman > Tel:+31 641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net > > (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > > > > On 16 May 2012, at 18:42, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > >> Seems like the effect on processing rules would be parallel to XMLLiteral, but without the @xmlns or @lang/@xml:lang promotion. >> >> Gregg >> >> On May 16, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> See, eg, >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012May/0027.html >>> >>> although the mail went to another group, it is good to know for this group, too, per HTML5+RDFa at some point in the future... >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2012 19:53:11 UTC