W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: FYI: HTML datatype in RDF 1.1

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:24:25 -0400
Cc: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1F90BC0E-51B7-4696-8341-E127959C60A7@w3.org>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
It is a matter of timing, but it may work out somehow. I hope that the RDF Concept document will go to LC by the end of this year. Ie, the timing of the LC-s for both document may still match. However, I expect that HTML+RDFa document to go to Rec much more quickly (after all, we have all the implementations). We can of course choose the less elegant step of adding that as a non-normative feature. 

I would definitely be in favour to do it somehow. B.t.w., I have already implemented it, too...

Ivan


On Sep 30, 2012, at 17:12 , Gregg Kellogg wrote:

> On Sep 30, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Is it feasible for us to incorporate the rdf:HTML datatype into
>> HTML5+RDFa? That is, how do the timelines of RDF 1.1 and HTML5+RDFa
>> recommendations line up? Specification-wise, it seems [1] should do
>> the job..
> 
> +1
> 
> We really should do this, I added support to my processor some time ago. It's really a better fit than XMLLiteral for an HTML-based host language.
> 
> Gregg
> 
>> Best regards,
>> Niklas
>> 
>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>> Exactly. No big deal, in fact.
>>> 
>>> But... until this is a standard, it cannot be, normatively, added to the RDFa document. But an informal note is possible.
>>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Ivan Herman
>>> Tel:+31 641044153
>>> http://www.ivan-herman.net
>>> 
>>> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 16 May 2012, at 18:42, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Seems like the effect on processing rules would be parallel to XMLLiteral, but without the @xmlns or @lang/@xml:lang promotion.
>>>> 
>>>> Gregg
>>>> 
>>>> On May 16, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> See, eg,
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012May/0027.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> although the mail went to another group, it is good to know for this group, too, per HTML5+RDFa at some point in the future...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----
>>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf






Received on Sunday, 30 September 2012 22:24:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:32 UTC