- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:24:25 -0400
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1F90BC0E-51B7-4696-8341-E127959C60A7@w3.org>
It is a matter of timing, but it may work out somehow. I hope that the RDF Concept document will go to LC by the end of this year. Ie, the timing of the LC-s for both document may still match. However, I expect that HTML+RDFa document to go to Rec much more quickly (after all, we have all the implementations). We can of course choose the less elegant step of adding that as a non-normative feature. I would definitely be in favour to do it somehow. B.t.w., I have already implemented it, too... Ivan On Sep 30, 2012, at 17:12 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: > On Sep 30, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it feasible for us to incorporate the rdf:HTML datatype into >> HTML5+RDFa? That is, how do the timelines of RDF 1.1 and HTML5+RDFa >> recommendations line up? Specification-wise, it seems [1] should do >> the job.. > > +1 > > We really should do this, I added support to my processor some time ago. It's really a better fit than XMLLiteral for an HTML-based host language. > > Gregg > >> Best regards, >> Niklas >> >> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-html >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >>> Exactly. No big deal, in fact. >>> >>> But... until this is a standard, it cannot be, normatively, added to the RDFa document. But an informal note is possible. >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> --- >>> Ivan Herman >>> Tel:+31 641044153 >>> http://www.ivan-herman.net >>> >>> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16 May 2012, at 18:42, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Seems like the effect on processing rules would be parallel to XMLLiteral, but without the @xmlns or @lang/@xml:lang promotion. >>>> >>>> Gregg >>>> >>>> On May 16, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >>>> >>>>> See, eg, >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012May/0027.html >>>>> >>>>> although the mail went to another group, it is good to know for this group, too, per HTML5+RDFa at some point in the future... >>>>> >>>>> Ivan >>>>> >>>>> ---- >>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>>>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2012 22:24:54 UTC