Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:58:03 +0200
Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> actually, under the current resolution, the triple will be
> 
> [] schema:url <http://www.example.org> .

OK, it is perhaps less bad than I previously thought.

But my point regarding [1] still stands.

____
1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/
2008Sep/thread.html#msg20

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:11:07 UTC